The Perks of Being an American Citizen: Beyond Borders and Duties
The Perks of Being an American Citizen: Beyond Borders and Duties
Being an American citizen carries a sense of pride and freedom, but it often comes with perceived limitations and responsibilities akin to those in other countries. However, when considering the unique aspects of American governance, the story takes on a different hue. This essay explores the broader implications of American citizenship and delves into the historical context and current challenges that shape the fabric of our nation.
Basic Perks of Being an American Citizen
Traditionally, for many, the perks of being an American citizen seem straightforward: the right to reside in the United States without too much hassle, the ability to enjoy the freedoms granted in the U.S. Constitution, and the option to serve in the military. However, the recent hyperbolic statements suggest a more stringent perspective, often focusing on duties rather than privileges.
At its core, being a U.S. citizen does reflect the principles enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, which come with a series of checks and balances designed to protect individual liberties. The jurisdiction of the United States is expansive, spanning from the fifty states to five territories, offering a wide array of options for residence. This freedom to move and settle anywhere within the nation's borders is a significant perk, as it allows for personal and professional growth without the hassle of moving to another country.
America versus American National: Understanding the Difference
When the conversation shifts from U.S. citizenship to American nationality, the discussion becomes more complex. This essay delves into the specific legal definition of an American National, as delineated in 8 U.S.C. 1502. This term refers to an individual who is not only a U.S. citizen but also subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in a broader sense.
The historical context painted by Justice John Marshall Harlan's dissent in Downes v. Bidwell (1901) reveals a critical juncture in American governance. Justice Harlan's lucid warning addressed the potential for a bifurcated government system, where one branch operates under the Constitution with specific limitations, while another wields unchecked legislative power. Harlan's fears resonated profoundly, as they underscore the subtle but significant shift in governmental control and the erosion of constitutional checks on legislative power.
Legislative Overreach and Constitutional Erosion
The implications of such a system are far-reaching. The current regime of American governance appears to be operating in a manner that Justice Harlan predicted would be disastrous for constitutional liberty. The argument that Congress should explicitly identify the lands and peoples for which they are in session is valid; it highlights a need for transparency and accountability.
Consider the phrase, "by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to..." This succinctly alludes to the extent of legislative power that the United States can wield, mirroring actions taken by other sovereign nations. The historical analogy to colonial rule, as seen in the essay's title "Once We Were Colonists – Subject to a King," provides a stark contrast. It suggests that the modern American citizen is once again under the thumb of a governing body that exercises power without restraint, akin to the monarchial rule of the past.
Conclusion: The Future of American Citizenship
Being an American citizen today carries both traditional privileges and contemporary challenges. While the freedom to live and work across the nation remains a vital perk, the broader implications of legislative overreach and the potential erosion of constitutional rights cannot be ignored. The path forward requires vigilance, transparency, and a commitment to upholding the principles of the Constitution to ensure that American liberty remains intact.
For more insights and discussions on these issues, visit