Should Kamala Harris Be Carved into Mount Rushmore?

The idea of carving Kamala Harris into Mount Rushmore as a form of satire or commentary has gained traction, espoused primarily by those who view her achievements and policy proposals with skepticism. It’s important to consider why some find this suggestion amusing and the broader implications of such a monumental change.

Satirical Perceptions and Jokes

One prominent suggestion has been to carve Kamala Harris into Mount Rushmore as a commentary on the contrast with the four male presidents currently included. This would serve a dual purpose: highlighting the underrepresentation of women and critiquing Harris's contributions. However, the joke is often told in a way that diminishes her efforts, with references to her "word salad" and lack of clear policy proposals.

"It is time for us to do what we have been doing. And that time is every day. Every day it is time for us to agree that there are things and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down."

Her words, often parodied by satire, highlight the perceived lack of coherence and strength in her policy stances. While this may seem humorous to some, it also serves to reinforce a narrative of inaction and incompetence.

Placing Her Near the Urinal

As a less flattering suggestion, placing her likeness near the porcelain urinal in the men's room is another form of criticizing her place in history and public perception. The humor in this idea lies in the absurdity of elevating someone to a space that is traditionally considered a lowbrow and mundane area.

"The porcelain urinal in the mens' room would be a suitable place for her likeness."

Symbolic Representation and Incompetence

Another facet of this debate revolves around the symbolic representation of Kamala Harris. Her presence looming over the uncarved stone of Mount Rushmore could serve as a critique of her perceived failure to make significant contributions. The uncarved stone itself, representing the underutilized potential, mirrors the sentiment that she is a "big zero" in terms of her impact.

"She is already there. All that uncarved stone represents her achievement as Vice-President She's a big zero. Uncarved stone is a big zero a perfect symbol for a perfectly incompetent person."

Partisan Critique and Virtue Signaling

From a partisan standpoint, critics argue that carving Kamala Harris into Mount Rushmore is not only satirical but also an affront to virtue signaling within the Democratic Party. They question her ability to inspire and lead, citing her status as the first woman, first Black, and first South Asian vice president as mere tokenism rather than genuine leadership.

"She is already there. All that uncarved stone represents her achievement as Vice-President She's a big zero. Uncarved stone is a big zero a perfect symbol for a perfectly incompetent person."

Part of the criticism also stems from the fear that adding her to this iconic group would be seen as a form of virtue signaling, suggesting that she was included simply to appear inclusive rather than based on merit.

Logical and Practical Considerations

Practically, the sculpture of Mount Rushmore already contains a number of presidential figures. Critics argue that there is simply no more room for additional busts, either physical or symbolic. Additionally, the process of adding another figure could lead to the destruction of the monument, as it has been historically protected from external additions.

"There is no more room for any presidential/vice presidential busts. Also I remember hearing that adding anyone else would lead to the destruction of Mount Rushmore."

Adding another figure would also mean re-evaluating the historical integrity and consistency of the monument, which is a significant undertaking with potentially negative consequences.

Conclusion

While the suggestion to carve Kamala Harris into Mount Rushmore as a satirical commentary may have a degree of humor or truth to it, it also reflects deep divisions within society over leadership and representation. It ultimately underscores the complexity of representation and the difficulty in achieving true recognition and respect in a deeply polarized political landscape.

"By what standards should Kamala Harris be carved into Mount Rushmore I trust this is not a serious question."

Whether such criticisms serve to highlight real issues or merely perpetuate partisan divides remains a topic of debate. What is clear is that the conversation surrounding Kamala Harris's legacy and place in history continues to evolve.