Why the Biden-Harris 2020 Ticket is Flawed

For many, the combination of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris as the 2020 Democratic ticket seemed like a sensible decision. However, this article delves into the reasons why many voters feel this pairing is far from ideal, highlighting issues with both candidates and their suitability for the presidency.

Joe Biden as a Political Shill

Joe Biden, as many point out, has taken a rather controversial path towards the 2020 presidential race. Behind him is the shadow of the Leftist leanings that control the Democratic Party. Critics argue that he appears to be a mere puppet for these left-leaning factions rather than an independent voice for the American people.

The title of “Meh” aptly describes much of the general sentiment towards both Biden and Harris. Both candidates are seen as lacking a strong ideological direction and appealing more to a broad, inclusive but perhaps directionless base. There’s a sense among voters that these are not political titans driving the nation but rather figures availing themselves of pre-existing influences and demographics.

Kamala Harris: The Critic’s Perspective

Entering the debate, Kamala Harris, while universally recognized for her trailblazing as a Black woman and a woman of color, faces extensive scrutiny in terms of her qualifications and political acumen. Critics argue that her selection as vice-presidential nominee involved more than a genuine desire for diversity and balance, but was likely due to political calculations.

The notion that Harris was “made to feel obligated” to represent certain demographic groups paints a picture of a political decision driven more by numbers and representation than a candidate’s fit for the role. It is suggested that the pool of potential candidates with better chances of winning was unfairly narrowed, eliminating potentially strong contenders due to this obligation.

Assessing the Biden-Harris Team

When assessing the overall strength of the Biden-Harris ticket, numerous weaknesses emerge. Critics observe that the team inherited significant challenges, including the failures of preceding administrations and lackluster accomplishments. Joe Biden, despite his decades of political experience, is painted as a “professional failure” by some. Similarly, Kamala Harris’s political record is scrutinized for its perceived lack of substance.

Both candidates are portrayed as individuals without a strong ideological compass or a compelling set of policies. The criticism suggests that they are susceptible to being influenced or led by more assertive personalities, which could harm their ability to lead effectively.

The Political Context

The political landscape has been a significant factor in the reception of this ticket. The Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the influence of big money are seen as key factors driving the choice of this team. Critics argue that these decisions are not purely democratic but rather strategic moves aimed at maintaining power within the party.

The idea that the “DNC has failed America and its citizens with BIDEN--HARRIS” highlights the intense dissatisfaction with the direction and failures of the party. This perception is rooted in the belief that the party’s focus on certain social and economic issues has alienated a significant portion of the American electorate.

For many, the only sensible alternative is to vote for third-party candidates like Howie Hawkins, hoping for a fresh start outside the two major parties.

In conclusion, the Biden-Harris ticket is perceived as a flawed combination, with both candidates facing severe scrutiny in terms of their suitability for the presidency. The underlying political context and the strategic decisions that led to their nominations add layers of complexity to this contentious election year.