Why Not Vote for Tulsi Gabbard in the 2020 Democratic Primaries

As the 2020 Democratic primaries heat up, it's crucial to carefully consider each candidate's platform and background. Tulsi Gabbard has garnered attention for her unique approach and background, but several compelling reasons exist as to why voting for her could be detrimental. In this article, we'll explore reasons why one might choose not to support Tulsi Gabbard for the Democratic nomination.

Adharma and the RSS Connection

Understanding Nationalism and Bigotry

Tulsi Gabbard is a prominent individual in the 2020 Democratic primaries, yet her alignment with certain ideologies raises significant concerns. A nationalist, by definition, is a type of bigot who prioritizes one aspect of life (such as race, religion, or national origin) over all others, often deeming these criteria superior to others. Gabbard's contributions and campaigns are funded by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the Indian equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan. The RSS is a deeply bigoted organization that has been responsible for the murder of thousands of non-Hindus. This is a glaring red flag for any potential candidate seeking a seat in Congress or the presidency.

Threats to LGBTQ Rights

Support for Discrimination

Tulsi Gabbard has a concerning voting record, particularly regarding LGBTQ rights. She has been strongly associated with policies that undermine the rights of queer individuals. Supporting such a candidate would be a disservice to the LGBTQ community. It is crucial to vote for a leader who has a solid and consistent track record of supporting these communities.

Anger and Inexperience

The Seeker of "Anger and Experience"

HSV-2 (or herpes) can be a metaphor for the anger and inexperience that Gabbard could bring to the presidency. While Gabbard may be wise and young, power in the White House requires more than just wisdom. A previous leader like JFK represents the type of young and inexperienced president that Gabbard could be. We should be wary of placing such a figure in such a critical position.

Military Misconceptions and Lack of Experience

Medical Training Rather than Military Engagement

Gabbard's military background as a medic brings another layer of concern. Serving in the military as a medic is vastly different from serving as a high-ranking military leader. Her claim to be a war fanatic and her desire to directly engage in combat with recruiters like Osama Bin Laden speaks to her lack of experience and suits an image of a "poser." This kind of background does not align with the expectations of a strong, experienced commander in chief.

Financial and Media Manipulation

The DNC Funding Scandal and Media Influence

During the Democratic National Convention (DNC), Gabbard's promise to not take corporate money could have been perceived as a strong stance on transparency and integrity. However, media investigations reveal that her commitment to this principle was not as firm as it appeared. Gabbard's solicitation of funds from Wall Street, despite her previous promises, undermines her credibility and casts doubt on her financial integrity. Additionally, her involvement in "surfing" (or engaging in viral social media tactics) further raises questions about her campaign's legitimacy and adherence to ethical standards.

Conclusion

The aforementioned reasons highlight significant concerns with Tulsi Gabbard's candidacy. Voting for her could be seen as a compromise between principles and practicality. While she may possess admirable qualities, her alignment with extremist ideologies, her record on LGBTQ rights, and her financial and media controversies all contribute to a compelling argument against her for the Democratic nomination. As the 2020 election approaches, it is essential to scrutinize each candidate's background and stance on key issues to ensure that the chosen leader genuinely represents the values of the Democratic Party.