Why Does America Allow Its Citizens to Renounce Their Citizenship?

No country can own a man in the name of basic human rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), to which the USA is a signatory. Yet, the United States (USA) continues to blatantly disregard these fundamental rights when it comes to its citizens' freedom to leave the country and renounce their citizenship.

Historical Context and Current Practices

From the citizenship-based taxation policies to the Civil War era and on to the implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), and now with the new $2,350 renunciation fee, the USA has imposed numerous obstacles on individuals seeking to renounce their citizenship. For instance, FATCA now explicitly makes it clear that Americans are the property of the US government and that they are no longer free to leave the country.

Renunciation of American Citizenship: A Deprivation of Freedom?

The practice of renouncing US citizenship is often portrayed as an injustice. In the current climate, anyone who renounces or attempts to renounce their American citizenship is labeled as a traitor. According to this perspective, renouncing US citizenship should be outright forbidden. The US government, however, should consider revoking citizenship for individuals who are deemed terrorists or who align with socialist or communist ideologies.

Call for a Fair and Just Process

It is imperative to reconsider the renunciation process in the USA to ensure it aligns with both national and international human rights standards. The renunciation process should be made clearer and more accessible to individuals, ensuring that it does not become a tool of coercion or disenfranchisement.

Broadening Citizenship Eligibility

Furthermore, the USA should consider revising its citizenship policies to better reflect the diverse demographics and contributions of its citizens. For example, the 50 states, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa should be recognized as jurisdictions where US citizenship is prevalent, with meritorious individuals within these territories being granted citizenship more easily. This would also extend to anyone born in these territories to American parents or anyone of American descent, ensuring that their rights and contributions are fully recognized.

Conclusion: Ensuring Freedom of Choice

The renunciation of citizenship should be considered a fundamental right, not a punishment or a source of fear. The USA must work towards creating an environment where individuals can make informed choices about their citizenship without facing undue penalties or discrimination. It is high time for the US government to reflect on its policies and ensure that they uphold the principles of freedom, justice, and equality.

By addressing these issues and implementing fairer and more accessible citizenship policies, the USA can reaffirm its commitment to the UDHR and ensure that its citizens can exercise their rights without fear or coercion. The path to a more just and inclusive nation starts with revisiting the current practices surrounding citizenship renunciation.