The Subjectivity and Objectivity of Art: How Can It Be Rated?

Art isn’t merely subjective since it doesn't remain in the mind of the artist but exists in perception. It is created and presented in an objective form. Thus, art should be judged and critiqued after it is finished, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation.

Art: A Blend of Subjective and Objective Perceptions

Art can be both subjective and objective. An observer cannot fully understand or see the art by merely observing the end product; instead, the process of art creation is essential. An artist generates an idea from personal instincts, emotions, and beliefs, which they then transform into a tangible form. This transformation is objective, aiming to connect with the viewer through various techniques, color schemes, and styles.

Therefore, the process of art creation can be broken down into three main stages: the personal perception of the artist, the art itself, and the personal perception of the viewer. While the artist and viewer's perceptions are subjective and influenced by their individual instincts and beliefs, the art and its presentation are objective. The artist aims to create work that interacts with and resonates with the audience.

Subjective and Objective Perspectives in Rating Art

The subjective side of art is deeply personal and can vary widely from one individual to another. However, when it comes to rating and critiquing, it is equally important to consider the objective aspects of the art. Objective criteria such as talent, originality, composition, craftsmanship, balance, color, detail, realism, lighting, and historical significance are critical. One should experience the art through their personal emotions and instincts, whether they align with the artist's or not. Subjective and objective elements intertwine crucially in the evaluation process.

For instance, consider two paintings by famous artists. When rated based on 10 important aspects of quality (talent, originality, composition, craftsmanship, balance, color, details, realism, lighting, and historical significance), each aspect can be given a score out of 10, with a total maximum score of 100. Subjectively, one painting might be rated higher due to its emotional impact or personal connection to the viewer. Objectively, both paintings could be considered equally skillful, as they are created with genuine artistic intent and materials.

Subjective personal opinions matter, as they define the concept of subjectivity. Artist opinions, however, are not the only ones that count. Public opinion and critical evaluations provide a more comprehensive and unbiased viewpoint. In a public vote, for example, one painting might stand out more, reflecting the collective appreciation of art enthusiasts.

Additional Considerations in Art Evaluation

Professional appraisers consider several other factors in evaluating art, such as the quality of materials used, permanence of pigments, and how well conservation techniques were utilized to ensure the piece lasts for generations. While these aspects are not immediately observable in the images provided, they play a significant role in the overall appraisal of the artwork.

It is crucial to recognize that disposable art, often created for short-term profit, is not the same as artwork that is genuinely appreciated and preserved for its cultural and historical significance. Art materials and techniques reflect the intent behind the artwork and its lasting impact on society.

Conclusion

In summary, art is a blend of subjective and objective experiences, and both elements must be considered when evaluating it. Personal emotions and instincts are vital in understanding and appreciating art, but they should complement a broader, more objective analysis. Art is not just a reflection of an artist's inner world but a tangible creation that interacts with the viewer. By considering both subjective and objective aspects, we can appreciate art more fully and evaluate it more effectively.