The Question of Excessive Equality of Opportunity

When discussing the concept of equality of opportunity, Peter Rhoads inquired, 'Is there such a thing as excessive equality of opportunity?' This query delves into a complex and often contentious topic, touching on the mechanics of equality, fairness in hiring, and the nature of human competition.

Poetic Assembly and Equality

The phrase 'excessive equality' is a poetic assembly, a clever play on words that attempts to introduce a concept contradicting the very definition of equality. However, the mechanics of the assembly, much like a simple equation, do not allow for one side to be more than the other. Here, the concept of 'equality' is demonstrated to be inherently balanced, making it impossible for the idea of 'excessive equality' to exist.

Equality and Competition

In reality, while most work tasks do not require a multitude of skills, the concept of fairness in hiring can sometimes veer into impracticality. For example, requiring years of work experience for a position meant for recent graduates shows how hiring practices can become overly restrictive. Such requirements, while seemingly fair, can inadvertently filter out qualified candidates, making the hiring process more about limiting applicants rather than ensuring fairness.

The Limits of Equality

However, the argument for 'excessive equality of opportunity' doesn’t hold water when scrutinized. Equality itself is about balance, and if something is truly equal, it cannot also be considered excessive. The essence of equality lies in fairness and justice, concepts that are fundamental to democratic societies.

Fairness and Democracy

It’s important to distinguish between fairness and an abundance of rights. A society that excessively distributes rights without adequate oversight can lead to a loss of personal responsibility and accountability. This is not the ideal of equality of opportunity but rather a dystopian scenario wherein certain individuals or groups can trump the rights of others, undermining the very fabric of equality.

The Role of Competition

Deepening into the core differences—whether genetic or environmental—could theoretically make all outcomes the same. Such a scenario would strip away the motivation to compete, which is essential for productivity in the economy. Without competition, the drive to innovate and improve would diminish, leading to a collapse in productivity and, in the most extreme cases, societal collapse.

Motivation and Free Will

The delineation between what is due to effort and what is due to genetic or environmental factors is not straightforward. History has shown that when humans face challenges, they often blame external influences, thus lessening their personal responsibility. Additionally, the rise of liberal philosophies that deny free will can further diminish motivation. Without the belief in personal choice, there would be no intrinsic reason to strive for better outcomes, leading to a stagnation in societal progress.

A Balanced Approach

While the idea of excessive equality of opportunity lacks a solid foundation, the practical challenges of maintaining true equality in a diverse society are significant. A balanced approach is necessary, one that ensures fairness in opportunities while also recognizing the importance of personal effort and responsibility. This approach must be based on evidence and pragmatism, allowing for the possibility of free will and individual agency.

Conclusion

The quest for fairness and equality of opportunity is a noble one, but it must be approached with a nuanced understanding of human nature and society. Excessive restrictions on opportunity are not the solution; rather, a balanced and evidence-based approach will ensure that the spirit of equality remains vibrant and effective.