Is it True as Dr. Robert Schoch Claims that the Pyramids of Egypt were Actually Built Over Pre-Existing Structures?

The assertion that the pyramids of Egypt were built over pre-existing structures has gained traction in recent years, particularly with the claims made by Dr. Robert Schoch. However, the validity of these claims is heavily debated among scholars and Egyptologists. This article delves into the controversy surrounding Dr. Schoch's theory and seeks to clarify the current understanding of Egypt's monumental architecture.

Dr. Robert Schoch and His Claims

Dr. Robert Schoch, a geologist and adjunct professor at Boston University, made headlines with his controversial claims regarding the origins of the Egyptian pyramids. Despite his academic credentials, his theories have been met with significant skepticism among the mainstream archaeological community. Schoch argued that the pyramids were constructed over earlier structures, suggesting a far older timeline for these iconic monuments.

Dr. Schoch's Theoretical Framework

According to Dr. Schoch, his claims are based on a thorough scientific examination and analysis. He used geological and climatic evidence to argue that the current form of the pyramids might have built over earlier structures to account for certain features. This theory is supported by the presence of water erosion marks on the Sphinx and the detailed investigations of the Step Pyramid of Djoser. However, the specifics of his claims are complex and require a deeper understanding of geology and archaeology.

Criticism and Skepticism

The academic community has largely rejected Dr. Schoch's claims, citing a lack of tangible evidence. Critics argue that the Step Pyramid of Djoser, for example, was intentionally constructed with multiple stages to evolve from a mastaba-type tomb. Similarly, the Great Pyramid has been known to have been built over a natural outcrop, which was already present, rather than over a completely pre-existing structure. This refutes the notion of a completely built-over site.

Alternative Theories and Evidence

Some alternative theories suggest that the pyramids were built near existing sites rather than in completely untouched areas. Evidence supporting this idea is found in the case of Stonehenge, which was built in phases thousands of years apart. The Sphinx, on the other hand, does show evidence of water erosion, suggesting that its body might be older than previously thought. Such findings indicate that the builders might have chosen a site with existing geological features for practical and symbolic reasons.

Conclusion

While Dr. Robert Schoch's claims add an interesting dimension to the historical understanding of the pyramids of Egypt, they remain highly contentious and lack robust evidence. For now, the predominant view among Egyptologists is that the pyramids were built on virgin land, and any pre-existing structures were incidental to their construction. Further research and excavation are necessary to fully understand the origins and development of these monumental structures.