Indian Leftists and Cultural Belittlement: A Complex Dynamic

The reactions of Indian leftists towards cultural belittlement by foreigners often reflect a complex interplay of political beliefs, cultural pride, and social media influence. This article explores the two main types of Indian leftists and their responses to such instances.

Understanding Indian Leftists

Indian leftists can be broadly categorized into two groups: actual communists and wannabe goras (foreigners).

Actual Communists

The first group comprises actual communists who have a consistent ideology and have historically fought for the interests of the marginalized and underprivileged in society. Their efforts included support for landless laborers, Adivasis, and other marginalized communities. Despite their problems, their commitment to their cause is unwavering.

Strengths: Consistency, conviction, and a track record of supporting the marginalized.

Wannabe Goras

The second group, often found in urban areas, exhibits a more performative and selective approach to leftism. Their actions often align with trending political correctitudes while lacking genuine commitment. Examples include changing Facebook profile photos to celebrate US gay marriages but remaining silent during India's 377 carve-up. Other instances include suddenly trending #NotMyPM after the US condemned PM Modi, despite him already being in power.

Strengths: Trending, social media awareness but lack of meaningful contributions.

Response to Cultural Belittlement

The response of Indian leftists to cultural belittlement from foreigners is multifaceted. Often, they join the foreign critics in mocking Indian culture and traditions, viewing it as a form of resistance. However, this reaction can be seen as both a loss and an opportunity for growth.

Perpetuating Misconceptions

Many Indian leftists contribute to the perpetuation of misconceptions about Indian culture. On subreddits like /r/canconfirmimindian, Indians frequently agree with foreigners mocking their country, thereby silencing those who wish to clear such misconceptions. This response not only damages the image of Indian culture globally but also undermines the intellectual discourse.

Example: When a foreigner ridicules a cultural practice or ritual, instead of addressing the misconception, some Indian leftists join in the ridicule, thereby entrenching negative stereotypes about India.

Amidst the Critique: A Need for Dialogue

Despite the criticisms, there are reasons to be optimistic. The greatest strength of PM Modi's leadership lies in the fact that it has pushed the moderates and classic liberals to the right by accusing them of being bhakts (followers). This has widened the gap between leftists and moderates and has made the political landscape more polarized.

The future of the Indian leftist movement can be bright if these leftists can engage in constructive debates without personal attacks or Nazi invoking, thereby gaining genuine support.

Defense of Freedom of Speech

The author takes a liberal stance on freedom of speech, asserting that everyone should have the right to express their opinions, even if it means belittling a culture. While freedom of speech is a crucial right, it should not be misused to harm individuals or groups. The discourse on cultural belittlement remains an open topic, with both supporters and critics challenging the limits of this freedom.

Conclusion: Cultural belittlement by foreigners is a complex issue. Indian leftists must balance their support for cultural pride with the respectful exercise of their freedom of speech. This way, they can foster a more inclusive and cohesive society.