What I Hate about Abstract Art

Abstract art has long been a contentious subject in the art world and beyond. Often derided for its perceived lack of depth and technical skill, the debate around whether abstract art possesses genuine artistic value remains lively. In this article, I explore my frustration and criticism of abstract art, particularly the movement known as Abstract Expressionism, and offer my thoughts on why it might be so polarizing.

The Problem with Abstract Art

Many people see abstract art as nothing more than a display of simplistic, unskilled work. The common refrain is, "My four-year-old could do that." This dismissive attitude towards abstract art stems from a misunderstanding of what abstract art aims to convey and the effort and skill required to create it.

Despite being recognized as masterpieces by some, many homes and offices still prefer pieces that are more traditional or easily recognizable. For instance, consider abstract art pieces like Mark Rothko's "No. 61 (Rust and Blue)" or Jackson Pollock's splatter paintings. These works are often described as mere splashes of color on canvas, yet they fetch highly exorbitant prices at auctions.

Abstract Expressionism: More Than Just Color and Chaos

Abstract Expressionism, one of the most notable movements in modern art, has been a source of great frustration for many artists and critics. Artist Mark Rothko, a key figure in this movement, is often criticized for reducing art to simple, large rectangles of color. The association of Rothko and other abstract expressionists with artistic genius is often met with skepticism.

While some argue that the emotional impact and connection to the viewer is the measure of an artwork's merit, I cannot help but roll my eyes when I see such glorification. Abstract art can be beautiful and moving, but it should not be an excuse for skillful artists to abandon their craft. The apparent ease with which these pieces are created and their high commercial value often overshadow the actual effort and talent behind them.

The Nature of Abstract Art

From my perspective, abstract art captures the essence of human emotion and energy in a raw, unfiltered form. It aims to represent the complex, chaotic nature of our inner lives that cannot be easily expressed through realistic depictions. Abstract art can be difficult to understand, given its lack of subject matter and the random nature of its forms. However, this very quality is what makes it compelling and thought-provoking.

As a form of art, abstract expressionism is the epitome of high energy and raw emotion. It provokes a visceral response and can be disorienting, just as our inner thoughts and feelings can be. The seemingly random and chaotic nature of these pieces reflects the randomness and uncertainty of life itself. In a world that can often feel controlled and robotic, abstract art stands as a reminder of the unpredictability and beauty of human experience.

Can we imagine a future where robots replace all human craftsmanship? It is a future that is not only possible but also likely. However, abstract art remains a powerful and enduring form that speaks to the unique qualities of the human experience, making it all the more valuable in our increasingly robotic future.

While some may find abstract art perplexing, I argue that it is precisely due to its complexity and the depth it offers that it is so captivating. Abstract art is not just about color and chaos; it is about the emotional and psychological journey it invites us to embark upon. In an age where we are becoming more robotic, abstract art stands as a testament to the beauty and unpredictability of the human soul.