Classic Films That Premonished Our Current Political Climate: A Comparison with Todays Leaders
Introduction
It is often said that history repeats itself, and in the realm of politics, this adage holds true. Many classic films from previous decades have accurately predicted events and behaviors that mirror our current political climate. This article explores several influential movies that have foreshadowed the rise of contemporary figures like Donald Trump, and suggests which among them would best serve as a historical mirror.
The Accurate Predictions of Classic Films
Network (1976)
The film Network is a prime example of a movie that accurately predicted the decline of traditional news broadcasting into the realm of infotainment. The character lived by the slogan 'If it bleeds, it leads,' which accurately portrays the sensationalism present in today's media. The film even predicted the use of social media and the internet to deceive and manipulate public opinion, hinting at the current state of 'fake news' and disinformation.
Faked News and Political Propaganda
Duck Soup (1933)
In Duck Soup, Groucho Marx's character, Rufus T. Firefly, ascended to the presidency of a bankrupt nation with a mere chance that mismanagement had led to the country's demise. His incompetence and lack of detail-oriented governance are starkly reminiscent of the current global leader. Firefly's dictatorial approach to leadership, from insulting foreign dignitaries to instigating unnecessary wars, mirrors a modern-day autocratic figure. Additionally, the film’s portrayal of a media-savvy and divisive leader, much like Trump, demonstrates the role of propaganda and manipulation in shaping public opinion.
Things to Come (1936)
Things to Come features a character who governs through fear and manipulation, much like the current political leader. The character, played by Ralph Richardson, employs fear-mongering and wars for the sake of power, reflecting the current political climate. The film's portrayal of media control and the suppression of dissenting voices is particularly relevant, as seen in recent years with the suppression of journalists and freedom of speech.
Citizen Kane (1941)
The character of Charles Foster Kane, played by Orson Welles, in Citizen Kane, echoes many of the traits displayed by today's leader, including his ruthless pursuit of power and manipulation of the media. Kane's creation of fake news and his willingness to use scandal and disinformation to advance his political agenda are striking parallels to modern politics. Additionally, the film's depiction of a sexual scandal threatening Kane's political career and his talk about "fraud at the polls" foreshadow the current accusations of election fraud and lies propagated on social media.
A Face in the Crowd (1957)
Andy Griffith stars as a populist media figure who gains power by exploiting people's fears and insecurities, much like the current political leader. The film highlights the role of media in shaping public sentiment and the dangers of allowing a single voice to dominate political discourse. It is a cautionary tale of how easily the masses can be swayed by empty rhetoric and manipulative speeches.
Idiocracy (2006)
Idiocracy presents a more satirical yet illuminating view of how a society can decline into ignorance and apathy, creating an environment ripe for a leader like the current political figure. The film's portrayal of a nation where intelligence is deemed undesirable and individuals are segmented by IQ levels bears a chilling resemblance to the current political discourse and the divide between educated and uninformed populations.
Conclusion
These classic films serve as a stark reminder of how political leaders and the media can manipulate public opinion and events. While Citizen Kane has been cited by Donald Trump as his favorite film, all these movies offer valuable insights into the political landscape. Watching these films can provide a deeper understanding of the current political climate and the dangers of misinformation and manipulation.